Surprisingly, Smoking Tobacco From A Pipe May Have Health Benefits


our facebook page for additional articles and updates.


Why Are We Told That Smoking Is So Bad For Us?

Because smoking cigarettes is. It harms almost every organ in your body. It causes 20% of all deaths in the united states annually. Cigarettes often contain poisons such as acetone, ammonia, arsenic, formaldehyde, lead, tar and more. Most studies on smoking that indicate how bad it is for you tend to group cigarette smoking which is full of these poisons with pipe smoking which contains none of these poisons. The chart below shows how likely a cigarette, cigar or pipe smoker is to develop lung cancer compared to a non-smoker.
· Non-smoker 1.0 (base number)
· Cigarette – 20 grams / day 16.0 (i.e. 16 x the risk of non-smokers)
· Cigar – 20 grams / day 3.2
· Pipe – if > 10 bowls per day 6.7
· Pipe – if 5 bowls per day 3.2
· Pipe – if 3 bowls per day 1.5
· Pipe – if 2 bowls per day 1.26
· typical – 2 bowls every 2-3 days ~1.05 (almost same as non-smoker)
Data taken from www.seattlepipeclub.org

Health Risks of Smoking in General

Smoking cigarettes causes tremendous health problems including: a number of cancers like lung and throat, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, heart disease, strokes and more. Smoking tobacco from a pipe causes minimal but still existent health risks and may actually have health benefits if not inhaled and not smoking excessive amounts over long periods of time.  We all know tobacco is addictive so it may be difficult to maintain a desired rate of smoking.  Some smokers report that smoking tobacco with no additives was less addictive for them than smoking tobacco with additives.

Tobacco Pipe

Tobacco Pipe (Photo By Abudimir85 / Wikimedia)

Does Smoking Tobacco From A Pipe Really Have Health Benefits?
This was so shocking and unbelievable to me when I heard it that I had to do more research. The following is a quote from the US Surgeon General report “Smoking and Health” (No. 1103, page 92) “Among the pipe smokers…The U.S. mortality ratios are 0.8 for non-inhalers and 1.0 for inhalers;”. So what does that mean, their study was using a mortality ratio of 1.0 as the mortality ratio for a non-smoker, and what they found is that pipe smokers that don’t inhale have a slightly lower mortality ratio which means that they live slightly longer.  That needs repeating…Pipe smokers that don’t inhale live longer that non-smokers according to that study. This makes it clear that smokers should switch to pipes, it would be a much healthier way to enjoy this natural herb.   If you do smoke, keep in mind that smoking a pipe as infrequently as once a day is recommended.  It is not recommended that non-smokers start smoking tobacco because of the addictive properties of nicotine.

Why Do Cigars And Chewing Tobacco Have Significantly More Health Risks Than Smoking From A Pipe?

Cigars and chewing tobacco don’t fill our bodies with the same toxins as cigarettes but they do have more health risks than smoking through a pipe. When smoking a cigar or chewing tobacco the tobacco is in constant contact with the sensitive parts of the mouth. That is why there is a higher risk of mouth cancer and mouth burns which could lead to cancer. More information, data and safe smoking habits can be found here www.seattlepipeclub.org

Native American Smoking A Pipe

Native American Smoking A Pipe

Conclusion

There are over 1 billion people that smoke cigarettes world-wide.  For these people, learning about the reduced risk of pipe smoking could satisfy their nicotine addiction and save their lives.  A smokers risk for lung cancer could be reduced by almost 94%.  The information in this article shows that smoking tobacco, one of natures herbs, in a responsible way does not increase health risks, and may actually have slight health benefits. The Native Americans and all the other indigenous smokers had it right, but in this century we have adulterated the hobby of smoking by adding so many poisonous chemicals.  Educating ourselves on the risks and benefits of enjoying one of natures herbs could lead to a much healthier life for smokers.

Many of our readers find that subscribing to Eat The Planet is the best way to make sure they don't miss any of our valuable information about wild edibles.

Subscribe to our mailing list



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I have been looking for the actual source for the caption above, but this is not it. The journal indicated does not contain the text shown, on any page.

    Here is the full text of page 92 of the journal indicated, which clearly does not include the text mentioned –

    resented as an additive function of the amount of smoking and the degree of
    inhalation (although other types of mathematical relationship would also fit
    the data). In their analysis, the average change in logarithm of death rate
    from “no inhalation” to “deep inhalation” is as great as the difference between
    consumption of less than 10 cigarettes and consumption of more than
    40 cigarettes daily.
    In the Canadian data the inhalers have higher mortality ratios than the
    non-inhalers for each amount of smoking. No trend with amount of smok.
    ing appears for the non-inhalers, but the ratios in this row are based on
    rather small numbers of deaths.
    For cigar smokers (current and ex-smokers) in the 25-state study 19 per.
    cent stated that they inhaled to some extent. The mortality ratio is 0.89 for
    non-inhalers and 1.37 for inhalers. The latter increase of 37 percent (based
    on 91 deaths) is statistically significant, but as the data have not been sub
    classified by amount of smoking the result may be partially a reflection of
    the increase in death rates noted in Table 4 for heavy cigar smokers. In the
    Canadian study, 13 percent of the cigar smokers classified themselves as in-
    halers, but the number of deaths is insufficient to present a breakdown of the
    mortality ratio by inhalation status.
    Among the pipe smokers there were 28 percent who inhaled in the U.S.
    study and 18 percent in the Canadian study. The U.S. mortality ratios are
    0.8 for non-inhalers and 1.0 for inhalers; the Canadian data contain too few
    deaths to allow a breakdown by inhalation.
    Ex-CIGARETTE SMOKERS
    For men who had stopped smoking prior to the date of enrollment, Table
    11 gives the mortality ratios from five studies for “cigarette only” smokers
    and “cigarette and other” smokers. The corresponding results for current
    cigarette smokers (from Table 2) are given for comparison. The distinc-
    tion between current and ex-smokers is not of course clear cut, since some
    current smokers may have stopped after enrolling in the study and some ex.
    smokers may have later resumed smoking.
    With one exception, the mortality ratios for ex-smokers lie consistently be-
    low those for current smokers and above those for non-smokers. In inter-
    preting comparisons of ex-smokers and current smokers there are at least
    three relevant factors. If smoking is injurious to health, cessation of smok,
    ing would be expected to reduce the mortality ratio. Secondly, some men
    stop smoking because of illness. In the 25-State study, over 60 percent of
    the men who had stopped smoking within a year prior to entry stated that a
    disease or physical complaint was one of the reasons for stopping (12).
    This factor would tend to make mortality ratios for ex-smokers higher than
    those for current smokers. Finally, ex-smokers may have previously smoked
    smaller amounts than current smokers. This factor is not the explanation
    of the drops in mortality ratios in Table 11. In a further breakdown by
    amount of smoking, made for the three largest studies, the mortality ratio
    for ex-smokers is consistently below that for current smokers for each amount
    smoked.
    92

    • The quote “Pipe smokers that don’t inhale live longer that non-smokers” does not actually exist in the text of the Surgeon General’s report. It was a paraphrase of the data you found, specifically the part that says “Among the pipe smokers there were 28 percent who inhaled in the U.S. study and 18 percent in the Canadian study. The U.S. mortality ratios are 0.8 for non-inhalers and 1.0 for inhalers; the Canadian data contain too few deaths to allow a breakdown by inhalation.”

      If the Seattle Pipe Club cited this as a direct quote, well, they were wrong. It is, however, an accurate interpretation of the data.

      • Walt, Thanks for the research, I really appreciate it. I attempt to make my articles as accurate as possible. I assumed the seattle pipe club’s information was accurate. I agree with you that the results do come to the same conclusion and i have seen other reports as well. but since it doesn’t say that exactly i’ve modified the article to be more accurate about the quotes.

    • Thanks a lot James, I’ve modified the article. I strive to be as accurate as possible, I assumed the quote on seattle pipe club was accurate, but i guess not. thats what happens when you assume. it seems like the results are the same but the quote is not there, so i clarified in this article.

  2. Thank you for the information. I recently put down cigarettes (1 pack+ a day) in favor of a pipe once or twice a day. I have been trying to research the health impact of that choice and the vast majority of what I have found is demonization of anything to do with tobacco. There is generally no data attached, just shaming. I think we all know there is likely some health impact in choosing a pipe over a carrot stick, but I prefer to make informed choices based on actual data.

    • ya, I had a little trouble finding data that distinguished between cigarettes and pipes. Its even hard to find data that distinguishes between additive free cigarettes and regular cigarettes. I am not a smoker but my interest in medicinal plants has lead me to question much of the data out there. I completely agree that smoking a pack a day of regular cigarettes is probably terrible for you and leads to all sorts of disease. but the other end of spectrum is to smoke additive free tobacco or other herbs from a pipe once a day or a few times a week.

  3. Do you have a source for the picture used in the article. I would love to be able to get a print for work. Thanks, Debbie

  4. Sorry but your statetment “Smoking tobacco with no additives poses drastically less health risks than cigarettes.” is just an urban legend.
    In fact there is – if any – only a small difference between additive tobacco smoke and organic tobacco smoke. Apart from this pipe tobacco often contains even more additives than cigarettes.

    The only reasons why pipes are lesse harmful are, that pipe smokers smoke less and they don’t inhale the smoke.

    • Thanks for the info, i did a little more research and changed that paragraph around. The only benefit i have heard repeatedly is that some people have found tobacco with no additives less addicting. therefore they were able to smoke less

  5. EXPERIMENT TIME!!!

    Required:Materials:

    A good magnifying glass or loupe
    Sheet of plain white paper
    A cigarette
    Premium pipe tobacco ex. Cap’n Black, Borkum Riff, e.g. the more expensive brands at your local store.
    Cheap “pipe tobacco”, the kind sold for roll your own smokes, ex. Criss Cross, <$15/lb in PA.

    Method:

    Dump a small amount of each on the paper, and examine with the magnifier

    Real tobacco leaf will look like a leaf, have tiny veins, irregular scaly appearance

    Fake tobacco leaf – will look like colored textured paper, and that is exactly what it is.
    Colored, textured paper made from the tobacco plant scraps and waste stalks, leaf ribs, etc.
    This is called TOBACCO-BY-PRODUCTS, and it is made the same way they make brown paper bags and cardboard for boxes. This process adds chemicals to break down the fibers into a slurry, which is rolled, dried, and run thru a texturizer to produce tobacco paper. Then they add tobacco flavoring, coloring, and nicotine to simulate real tobacco leaf.

    Observations/Results:

    Cigarette tobacco has a lot of this material in it.
    Cheap pipe tobacco has some of it in it
    My Captain Black has none of it in it, in fact an occasional stem that slipped thru the sieve is encountered.

    Discussion:

    Does all of the additional processing/added chemicals to make the tobacco-by-product paper found in cigarettes contribute to the additional unhealthiness? Do the added colorings, flavors, and nicotine also contribute???

    Other Considerations:

    One other difference between cigarettes, cigars, and pipes…
    Cigarette filters are made from polyester fiber, remember the last time you lit the wrong end, probably after drinking a lot of alcohol, it melted, and smelled like burning plastic.
    The minute bits of polyester fibers that are inhaled (respirable) cannot be broken down by the body, and act as a lung irritant like asbestos fibers, and silica fibers.
    The minute bits of tobacco inhaled (respirable) by pipe, and cigar smokers (no filters) are eventually broken down by the body, and eliminated just like any other plant based dust one may regularly inhale.
    Poly carpet fiber, and poly clothing originating dust make have a similar effect as cigarette filter material.

  6. The statement in question was a quote from Dr. Gaboriau’s speech, not from the Surgeon General’s report. As the webmaster at seattlepipeclub.org, I have removed the quote marks from this statement to avoid confusion.

  7. I actually took up pipe smoking from my own research into the health benefits. Pipe smoking used to be used as a treatment for bad breath and allergies, something that I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt work.

    While it’s only conjecture on my part, I think it works in both cases due to the acidic nature of the smoke. It changed the pH of my mouth, so the bacteria that caused my bad breath were basically killed off (I used to have a constant white coating that I could never get rid of no matter how much I brushed/scraped my tongue, but has now been gone for over 3 year. I had that coating for the better part of 30 years).

    As for my allergies, I think the smoke desensitizes the nerves in the nasal passage. Before I started smoking my pipe, I had tried nearly every allergy medicine except nasal sprays because I didn’t like the post nasal drip they caused, and nothing really worked. Within 2 months of smoking my pipe however, bearing in mind I would smoke it once a day for 2-3 days in a row , almost all my nasal allergy conditions are for the most part gone.

    I went from basically eating 2-3 bags of cough drops a week to control my cough to maybe a bag a month under the worst allergy months. So for me, the quality of life I have after I started smoking a pipe is like night and day.

    • That’s great first hand information. To me it highlights the need to remember to approach everything in moderation. It was very difficult to find information for the article. We all know the health risks of smoking but it seemed that people were afraid to write about the benefits and how to aim to reduce the risks, primarily by not smoking a too much.

  8. We switched to buying cigarette tubes & packing them with pipe tobacco…
    Not only is it much healthier (if you MUST) smoke… But it costs a fraction of the price… A carton of name brand cigarettes is about $55 (200 cigarettes)
    One box of cigarette tubes (200) and one bag of pipe tobacco is about $8 (200 pipe tobacco cigarettes)
    Big difference!!!

  9. This is incredibly interesting! I always believed that there are benefits and risks to everything. Sometimes risks outweigh benefits. But with very occasional smoking, specifically from a pipe it seems like benefits outweigh risks. My guess is that it could be the stress reduction having a more positive effect than any negative effect of tobacco.

  10. Your ‘facts’ are riddles with flaws and misinformation. You’re spreading lies about smoking. Almost none of your information here is correct. Read that again, ALMOST NONE of this information is fact based. Anyone with a brain can see right through all of this nonsense. get your facts straight or get this page closed down, it is an abomination.

    • I tried to mention my sources in the article, I’m definitely not an expert on smoking nor do I claim to be. If you know that any data is specifically wrong, then let me know and I’ll change it or add additional data. If people switch from smoking cigarettes everyday to smoking a pipe a few days a week then according to what I have seen, that seems better for their health.